Int Conf AIDS. 1996 Jul 7-12;11(1):184 (abstract no. Mo.D.1760). Unique
2 Family Health InternationalObjective: To monitor and supervise the
implementation of 39 subprojects with local government and non
government organizations for HIV/AIDS/STDs prevention in collaboration
with Family Health International with funds from USAID. Methods: Brazil
is a AIDSCAP priority country. In order to supervise and monitor the
implementation of subprojects it was created a local infrastructure with
qualified team. This team developed together with local GO and NGOs a
total of 17 large subprojects and 22 small projects (funds up to 5,000
USD). Each sub project summarizes in the logframe table the measurable
indicators and the means of verification that ultimately will assess the
overall project implementation. In order to register properly process
indicators for each large and small subproject, a process indicator form
(PIF) was developed. The large projects based their PIFs in the projects
logframe table and a standard form was created for the small projects.
The form is an important tool to register data on monthly basis (for
large projects) or at the end of project for the small ones. All project
managers, coordinators and assistants were trained to understand the
concept of PIF and the needs to register all the required data to follow
up subprojects perfomance. Results: From August 93 to September 95 a
total of 216,349 people were educated, 4,930 were trained on HIV/AIDS
prevention, 91,187 STDs patients were diagnosed and treated, 36,353,105
condoms were distributed 25,563,930 sold and 10,789,179 free) by the
AIDSCAP Project in Brazil.Constrain: Despite training we have an
important underreporting of process indicator data. Not all activities
are contemplated in the forms, therefore are not recorded. NGO and GO
are not used to register educational activities in systematic basis.
Positive points: An important improvement of data collection and
registration was accomplished specially by the NGO. NGO's are now more
prepared and aware of the need to register activities as part of a self
assessment. The PIF information system has improved the local agencies
monitoring and evaluation process. Conclusion:1. Refinement of PIF
collection and reporting is a ongoing process. 2. Retrospective analyses
and review of some subprojectss can improve significantly data
collection.
*Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome/PREVENTION & CONTROL *Health
Education *Health Services *HIV Infections/PREVENTION & CONTROL
*Program Evaluation