AIDS. 1996 Dec;10 Suppl 4:S25-30. Unique Identifier : AIDSLINE
OBJECTIVE: To describe the treatment patterns for intravenous
ganciclovir induction and maintenance therapy in AIDS patients with
cytomegalovirus (CMV) retinitis in five European countries and to
investigate the anticipated impact of oral ganciclovir on resource
utilization during maintenance. DESIGN: Study was a retrospective
analysis based on a prospective randomized clinical trial (AV1034)
comparing the efficacy of oral versus intravenous ganciclovir in CMV
retinitis maintenance therapy. Resource utilization patterns for
ganciclovir induction and maintenance, retinitis progression and
management and treatment of adverse events were based on clinical trial
data and interviews with local experts involved in treatment of patients
with CMV retinitis. RESULTS: Oral ganciclovir maintenance was effective,
although associated with a faster time to progression, compared to
intravenous ganciclovir. There was considerable variation in the
treatment patterns for induction with intravenous ganciclovir in the
different countries. Most inductions were achieved with a central
intravenous line, also used in subsequent intravenous maintenance
therapy, usually performed on an outpatient or day care inpatient basis.
Intravenous maintenance therapy was identified as a large resource
utilization which would decrease considerably with the introduction of
oral ganciclovir. In addition, decreased incidence of adverse side
effects with oral ganciclovir would also lead to decreased resource use.
CONCLUSIONS: Introduction of oral ganciclovir is expected to lead to
significant reduction in resource use and may avoid the need for central
line placement. This, and the lower incidence of adverse side effects,
normally associated with intravenous ganciclovir, are also expected to
lead to improvement in the patient's quality of life.
*Antiviral Agents/THERAPEUTIC USE *AIDS-Related Opportunistic
Infections/DRUG THERAPY *Cytomegalovirus Retinitis/DRUG THERAPY
*Ganciclovir/THERAPEUTIC USE *Physician's Practice Patterns
*Utilization Review