Resource Logo
Reuters New Media

Court blocks Indiana law cutting Planned Parenthood funds




 

* US appeals court in Chicago blocks 2011 law

* Law sought to block Medicaid funds from clinics

* Planned Parenthood calls decision a victory

* Indiana says reviewing decision, to defend state law

Oct 23 (Reuters) - A federal appeals court has blocked Indiana from enforcing a law to cut off Medicaid funds for Planned Parenthood, a law that critics said would deprive thousands of low-income people of medical services, including abortion.

The 7th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals on Tuesday ruled that while Indiana has broad authority to exclude unqualified providers from its Medicaid program for the poor, it lacks authority to exclude a class of providers - in this case Planned Parenthood clinics - for reasons unrelated to their qualifications.

It said doing so deprives Medicaid recipients of their legal right to obtain care from qualified providers of their choosing.

"Indiana maintains that any harm to Planned Parenthood's Medicaid patients is superficial because they have many other qualified Medicaid providers to choose from," Circuit Judge Diane Sykes wrote for a three-judge panel. "This argument misses the mark."

While the 7th Circuit decision applies in Illinois, Indiana and Wisconsin, it could have wider significance.

Lawmakers in more than a dozen states have in the last few years taken steps to cut off funding for Planned Parenthood, prompting it to file several lawsuits.

Planned Parenthood is the country's largest provider of abortions, conducting about one-fourth of those performed in the United States. Last year, Republicans unsuccessfully tried to end federal funding for Planned Parenthood.

Indiana Governor Mitch Daniels, a Republican, had signed the law banning the funding in May 2011, but U.S. District Judge Tanya Walton Pratt in Indianapolis put it on hold the following month.

Tuesday's decision upheld much of Pratt's preliminary injunction and returned the case to her court.

Indiana Attorney General Greg Zoeller said his office, which argued the state's appeal, will review the decision before deciding how best to continue defending the law.

"The people's elected representatives in the legislature decided they did not want an indirect subsidy of abortion services, such as payroll and overhead, to be paid with taxpayers' dollars," Zoeller said in a statement.

In court papers, Planned Parenthood had said that the loss of Medicaid funding in Indiana would force it to close seven of its 28 health centers in that state, forcing nearly 21,000 patients to look elsewhere for medical care.

GOVERNMENT SUPPORT

The federal government had supported Planned Parenthood's appeal. Medicaid is jointly funded by the federal and state governments.

"This is a total victory," said Ken Falk, legal director for the American Civil Liberties Union of Indiana, which handled Planned Parenthood's appeal.

"It is significant because, around the country, there are hundreds of thousands of people who get services through Planned Parenthood that are reimbursed by Medicaid," he said. "To allow those services to be denied solely because a state does not like other things that Planned Parenthood does can cause serious harm to people who depend on it for basic medical needs."

Planned Parenthood also provides services other than abortion, such as cancer and HIV screenings, contraception and family planning. Three percent of its services relate to abortion, according to its website.

Half of Planned Parenthood's $970 million of revenue in the year ended June 30, 2010 came from government health services grants and reimbursements, according to its annual report. Planned Parenthood said it performed more than 329,000 abortion procedures that year.

The case is Planned Parenthood of Indiana Inc et al v. Commissioner of the Indiana State Department of Health et al, 7th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals, No. 11-2464.



 


Copyright © 2012 -Reuters New Media, Publisher. All rights reserved to Reuters .Ltd. Republication or redistribution of Reuters content is expressly prohibited without the prior written consent of Reuters. Reuters shall not be liable for any errors or delays in the content, or for any actions taken in reliance thereon.

Information in this article was accurate in October 23, 2012. The state of the art may have changed since the publication date. This material is designed to support, not replace, the relationship that exists between you and your doctor. Always discuss treatment options with a doctor who specializes in treating HIV.