Resource Logo
Associated Press

Bishops Emphasize Ethics in Ban on Condoms; Law of Secondary Effect




 

LEAD: To the Editor:

To the Editor:

Archbishop Roger Mahony's committee of Roman Catholic bishops seems to have missed an opportunity to work more closely with public health officials (editorial, Oct. 20).

When I taught at Fordham University, solidly orthodox Jesuits once explained to me the law of secondary effect, a well established principle of Catholic theology. Under its terms, a communicant may without theological error perform an act the secondary effect of which is sinful, so long as its primary effect is not.

The example given me was that of a seriously ill patient to whom medication is given that will ease his pain and shorten his life. No sin occurs here, because the primary effect is blameless.

Is this not applicable to the condom and acquired immune deficiency syndrome? In this light, may not even the most devout Catholic use condoms if his primary purpose is to avoid the spread of disease, even if the secondary effect does indeed promote "morally unacceptable" behavior? Is not such behavior more acceptable than administering medication that causes death? JOHN GRIFFIN San Rafael, Calif., Oct. 22, 1989



 


Copyright © 1989 -Associated Press, Publisher. All rights reserved to Associated Press. Reproduction of this article (other than one copy for personal reference) must be cleared through the AP Permissions Desk.



Information in this article was accurate in November 3, 1989. The state of the art may have changed since the publication date. This material is designed to support, not replace, the relationship that exists between you and your doctor. Always discuss treatment options with a doctor who specializes in treating HIV.