AIDS TREATMENT NEWS #216, February 12, 1995
The U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (PTO) will now allow AIDS
and cancer patent applications to receive top priority review,
PTO Commissioner Bruce Lehman told AIDS TREATMENT NEWS on
February 3. The new priority applies only if the patent
applicant requests it, and the request is approved by the PTO.
The new change is not yet well known, even by pharmaceutical
companies applying for patents; we believe this article is the
first public report. [See interview with Commissioner Lehman,
page 4.]
The new system allows the applicant for a patent on a treatment
for AIDS or cancer to ask that the application be "made
special," under rules outlined in the MANUAL OF PATENT
EXAMINING PROCEDURE (section 708.02). This special status has
previously been available only for patents related to
environmental quality, energy, safety of recombinant DNA
research, and superconductivity, and in certain unusual
situations. Patent examiners are instructed to give these
"special" applications top priority, not only initially, but
also in all subsequent actions while the application is
pending.
Biotechnology patents now take an average of about 21 months
from the time of filing until they are granted or rejected. The
new rule will be important in cases where a drug developer or
other inventor has a high-priority invention and wants to move
it quickly. This will not only speed the development of the
drug in question, but can also facilitate discovery of other
treatments as well, since companies often keep their research
secret until the patent is granted.
But the public should realize that many medical patents are
deliberately delayed by the companies that apply for them --
and the new rule will not help in this case. Why would anyone
purposely slow their own patent application? The reason is that
if the patent is granted years before the FDA approves the drug
for marketing, the 17-year patent term will start running, and
by the time the FDA approves the drug or medical device, part
of the 17 years will have already expired. The company must
APPLY for the patent early, to avoid a competitor applying
first; but it may not want to RECEIVE the patent until later.
As a result, information important for medical research and for
patient care can be withheld for long periods.
This problem should be reduced in the future, because of the
new implementing legislation for the GATT treaty (the General
Agreement on Tariffs and Trade), recently approved by Congress.
Under the new law, the U.S. patent term will follow the
international standard of 20 years from the date of filing, not
17 years from the date of issuance; this provision will take
effect on June 8, 1995. There will be less incentive to
deliberately delay pharmaceutical patents filed after that
date.
www.aegis.org