3rd Conf Retro and Opportun Infect. 1996 Jan 28-Feb 1;:155. Unique
Background: Lymphocyte subset analysis by flow cytometry is generally
performed on fresh blood samples, which is not cost-efficient for small
batches and precludes analysis of serial samples in controlled runs. We
report an alternative method utilizing frozen whole blood. Methods:
Aliquots of 20 EDTA-anticoagulated whole blood samples (11 HIV+, 9 HIV-)
were tested with anti-CD3/4/45 and anti-CD3/8/45 fresh (less than 18
hrs. post draw), and after freezing for 7-180 days at -80C or 160C
(LN2), with and without 10% DMSO. Analysis utilized gating on bright
CD45 cells with low side 70 scatter. Lymphocyte counts were obtained on
fresh samples with an automated analyzer. Results: Percentage of CD3 + ,
CD4 + , CD8 + lymphocytes correlated closely in fresh and frozen
aliquots. + Figure shows linear regression for % CD3+4+ cells, fresh vs.
frozen at -80C (slope = 1.015x, y-intercept = -0.35). Net mean
fluorescence intensity was slightly lower in frozen cells compared to
fresh (-10% loss for CD4+ without DMSO; -5% with DMSO). Conclusions:
Ability to accurately enumerate lymphocyte subsets on frozen whole blood
by combining fresh cell counts with immuno-phenotyping on frozen samples
should facilitate: 1) cost-effective batch testing, 2) analysis of
frozen repository samples, and 3) testing of serial samples in the same
run, thereby diminishing run-to-run variability and allowing detection
of small changes in subset markers for monitoring disease progression
and effects of therapy. See original to view figure.
Antigens, CD3/ANALYSIS Antigens, CD4/ANALYSIS Antigens, CD8/ANALYSIS
Cell Separation Flow Cytometry Human *Lymphocyte Subsets
Lymphocytes/IMMUNOLOGY Regression Analysis ABSTRACT
www.aegis.org