British HIV Association logo

12th Annual Conference of the British HIV Association


29 March–1 April 2006, Brighton, UK



COULD PRIMARY CARE BE DOING MORE?

HIV Med 2006; 7(Suppl. 1):8 (abstract no. O29)

Fiona Burns1, Anne Johnson1, James Nazroo2, Ibidun Fakoya1, Jane Anderson3, Munyaradzi Chikohora4, Simone Ghosh5, Andy Hughes6, Eva Jungmann7, Sarah Manney8, Nneka Nwokolo9, Nina Panahmand7, Michelle Slinn10, Richard Stack9, Ann K. Sullivan9, Cheryl Tawana11, Fiona Young12 and Kevin Fenton13
1 Department of Primary Care and Population Sciences, Royal Free and University College Medical School, London, 2 Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, UCL, London, 3 Homerton University Hospital NHS Trust, London, 4 North West London Hospitals NHS Trust, London, 5 St Georges Healthcare NHS Trust, London, 6 St Mary’s NHS Trust, London, 7 Camden Primary Care Trust, London, 8 Barts and The London NHS Trust, London, 9 Chelsea and Westminster Healthcare NHS Trust, London, 10 West Hertfordshire Hospitals NHS Trust, Watford, 11 Newham University Hospital NHS Trust, London, 12 North Middlesex University Hospital NHS Trust, London, UK, 13 Centre for Disease Control, Atlanta, GA, USA


INTRODUCTION: In the UK, Africans present to HIV services with significantly more advanced HIV disease than non-Africans, denying themselves the full benefit of available treatment. Little is known about healthcare utilisation prior to diagnosis for this population.

OBJECTIVES: To identify opportunities for earlier diagnosis of HIV amongst Africans in London.

METHODS: A survey of newly diagnosed HIV-positive Africans attending 14 HIV treatment centres across London between April 2004 and February 2006 using a self-completed questionnaire linked to clinical records.

RESULTS: 236 questionnaires were completed, representing an 82% response rate. 66% of respondents were women, 72.3% came from countries with an HIV prevalence of over 15%, 78.3% were aged between 25 and 44, and 54.2% had advanced HIV (CD4 <200 cells/µl or an AIDS-defining illness) at the time of diagnosis. 84.7% of respondents were registered with a GP for a medium time of 3 years, and 75% saw their GP within the 2 years prior to diagnosis, most commonly for flu or chest infection. In the year prior to diagnosis 69.3% saw their GP for a medium of two visits (range 1–18). HIV testing was raised by the GP for 16.3% of participants.

DISCUSSION: These preliminary data show that primary care services are well accessed by this population. The demography alone should alert clinicians to considering HIV irrespective of health status. However, for over 80% of respondents who attended their GP, the issue of HIV testing was not broached. Work with primary care services is required to understand and overcome the barriers to discussing HIV infection for this, and all, populations.

Acrobat Reader Download PDF logo

2006-03-29
O29


Copyright © 2006 - British HIV Association (BHIVA) Reproduction of this abstract (other than one copy for personal reference) must be cleared through the BHIVA Organising Secretariat 1 Mountview Court, 310 Friern Barnet Lane, London N20 0LD