British HIV Association logo

13th Annual Conference of the British HIV Association


29 March–1 April 2007, Brighton, UK



AN INVESTIGATION INTO THE FREQUENCY AND REASONS WHY PATIENTS SWITCH ANTIRETROVIRAL THERAPY AND WHICH ANTIRETROVIRALS ARE IMPLICATED WHEN SWITCHING BECAUSE OF TOXICITY: THE CHELSEA SWITCH INVESTIGATION (CSI) DATA

HIV Med 2007; 8(Suppl. 1):7 (abstract no. O25)

Iain Davidson, Helen Beardsell, Brian Smith, Brian Gazzard and Mark Nelson
St Stephen’s Centre, Chelsea and Westminster Hospital, London, UK


PURPOSE OF THE STUDY: To determine the rate that patients switch their antiretroviral therapy, why they switch and to calculate an observed toxicity switch rate for each antiretroviral.

METHODS: Outpatients’ prescriptions from the HIV cohort between 1st May and 31st Oct ‘06 were reviewed. All prescriptions involving a switch in antiretroviral therapy were recorded with details of which antiretrovirals were switched and the reason.

SUMMARY OF RESULTS: A total of 14% (n=469) of regimens were switched over the 6-month period affecting 13% (n=433) of patients. Excluding the tenofovir/lamivudine to truvada switches, this rate falls to 10% of patients in 6 months. The reasons for switch (excluding switches of tenofovir/lamivudine to truvada and switches because of the tenofovir/didanosine drug interaction) were 61% toxicity, 14% failure, 13% simplification, 4% drug interaction and 8% other (including pregnancy and hepatitis). Of the 202 switches for toxicity 44% were due to zidovudine (85/88 due to actual/potential lipodystrophy), 9% tenofovir (18/19 renal complications), 8% stavudine (14/16 actual/potential lipodystrophy), 8% efavirenz (15/16 CNS side-effects), 5% Kaletra (7/10 diarrhoea), 4% saquinavir (9/9 GI side-effects), 4% atazanavir (7/8 jaundice) and 4% abacavir (5/8 suspected/actual HSR). An observed toxicity switch rate (OTSR) per 1000 patient years (95% CI) was calculated for each antiretroviral (table 1).

NRTIs OTSR (95% CI) PIs OTSR (95% CI)
Stavudine 304.9 (174.3–495.1) Fosamprenavir 89.5 (10.8–323.5)
Zidovudine 224.6 (180.2–276.8) Saquinavir 81.2 (37.1–154.0)
Didanosine 27.6 (9.0–64.4) Kaletra 46.9 (22.5–86.2)
Tenofovir 19.8 (11.9–30.9) Atazanavir 27.0 (11.7–53.2)
Abacavir 15.1 (6.5–29.7) NNRTIs
Emtricitabine 9.9 (3.2–23.0) Efavirenz 24.7 (14.1–40.1)
Lamivudine 1.2 (0.03–6.5) Nevirapine 15.8 (4.3–40.4)

CONCLUSIONS: Ten percent of patients switched therapy in 6 months predicting that one in five patients will change their therapy every year. Stavudine and Zidovudine have a significantly higher OTSR than the other nucleoside/nucleotide analogues. There is no significant difference in the OTSR with the NNRTIs or the PIs.

Acrobat Reader Download PDF logo

2007-03-29
O25


Copyright © 2007 - British HIV Association (BHIVA) Reproduction of this abstract (other than one copy for personal reference) must be cleared through the BHIVA Organising Secretariat 1 Mountview Court, 310 Friern Barnet Lane, London N20 0LD