Integrated Regional Information Networks - September 29, 2009

"As a committee we are advocating for the government to increase its funding on HIV/AIDS activities in the country to at least 15 percent [of the national budget]," said Beatrice Rwakimari, chair of the committee.

Uganda's most recent budget allocated about US$30 million to the purchase of anti-retrovirals and anti-malaria medication, and gave the Uganda AIDS Commission about $3 million to fight HIV, while $500,000 was earmarked for prevention programmes.

The total allocation to HIV programmes - which makes up 6 percent of the national budget - marks an increase on previous years, but the MPs say it is still not nearly enough to roll back the effects of the pandemic.

"This funding is too little, as we continue to get new infections every year," Rwakimari said. Uganda's HIV prevalence has risen marginally from a low of 6 percent in 2000 to 6.4 percent, according to the government.

Dependence on donors

Chris Baryomunsi, also a member of the House HIV committee, told IRIN/PlusNews that Uganda could not continue to rely on donor funding to sustain its HIV programmes.

According to the Ministry of Health, more than 80 percent of the country's HIV funding is from foreign sources; the two leading donors are the Global Fund to fight AIDS, Tuberculosis and Malaria and the US President's Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief.

"We appreciate funding from donors, but as a country we can't continue relying on them; we must invest on our own for purposes of ownership and sustainability," he said. "We want to see continuous progressive increments in government spending on HIV each year until we reach about 30 percent.

"When a person is put on ARVs, he or she is supposed to be on them for the rest of their lives," he added. "What will happen to them if donors suddenly withdraw their help?"

ARV provision, prevention campaigns, condom distribution, testing and research, are among the activities the MPs feel require additional government funding.

The MPs have also stressed the need to spend earmarked funds as intended - the government's $30 million 2008/09 budgetary allocation for the purchase of anti-retroviral drugs was largely diverted to pay for, among other things, health worker salaries and shares in a local ARV manufacturing plant.

Health Minister Stephen Mallinga said although the legislators' appeal made sense, the government simply did not have the money to spend on HIV.

"It's true we need more money for HIV/AIDS prevention, care, treatment, etc, in the country, but where is the money? The government doesn't have funds," Mallinga told IRIN/PlusNews. "Funding for the Ministry of Health is too low."

090929
IR090936

Always watch for outdated information. This article first appeared in 2009. This material is designed to support, not replace, the relationship that exists between you and your doctor.

AEGiS presents published material, reprinted with permission and neither endorses nor opposes any material. All information contained on this website, including information relating to health conditions, products, and treatments, is for informational purposes only. It is often presented in summary or aggregate form. It is not meant to be a substitute for the advice provided by your own physician or other medical professionals. Always discuss treatment options with a doctor who specializes in treating HIV.

Copyright ©1980 – 2009. AEGiS. All materials appearing on AEGiS are protected by copyright as a collective work or compilation under U.S. copyright and other laws and are the property of AEGiS, or the party credited as the provider of the content. .